By Mohamed A. Samatar
June 20, 2020, The Somaliland-Somalia talks in Djibouti: The Unintended Consequences.
On June, 14th 2020 the international partners led by the United States
Ambassador (Donald Y. Yamamoto) and other multi international stakeholders
including European Union, African Union, Ethiopia and the host country of Djibouti
held talks between Somaliland and Somalia.
The talks between the two parties started back in 2012 in Ankara, Turkey.
The talks stalled for the last three and a half years following the
parliamentarian election of the current president of Somalia, Mohamed
Abdullahi (Farmajo).
The Somaliland president was elected by one-man-one vote and was
observed by international monitors which was declared free and fair
election.
The Ankara communique included the following highlights:
“ . . . it is stated that the purpose of the Ankara meeting is to reopen the
dialogue after the change in the leadership of the Somali Federal Republic,
and to establish a way forward for the dialogue.
Moreover, the agreement concerning the encouragement and facilitation of
international aid and development provided to Somaliland is also cited in
the Communique where the parties commit to refrain from using any
inflammatory language and any other act which may put the continuation
of the dialogue at risk.
“Parties will share intelligence and cooperate in the fight against terrorism,
extremism, piracy, illegal fishing toxic dumping, maritime crime and
serious crime, stated in the Communique…” (“Somalia and Somaliland
Sign “Ankara Communique””).
Unfortunately, the Farmajo regime started an overly aggressive campaign
against Somaliland, undermining and violating all prior agreements
between the two countries including: propaganda tactics, that included
Exploiting unsuspecting Somaliland youths through social media by luring
them with few dollars, sabotage of developmental projects and programs,
attempts to block livestock exports to Saudi Arabia. This was one of the
most naked aggressions against Somaliland since the collapse of the
military regime of Siad Bare.
The Somali authorities suggested that Somaliland dealers obtain a certificate of health for their livestock from
Mogadishu before they are able to export to Saudi Arabia. They also
violated the accord of air traffic joint management between the two
countries. Somaliland, having experienced
these belligerent attempts from Somalia to undermine their existence, was not fond of any future talks with the current regime.
However, after a lot of pressure and multiple attempts from powerful
countries, especially the United States of America to restart the talks, they
agreed to seat at the table with their opponents, provided it is an open and
transparent talk at an international arena.
Obviously, different stakeholders and countries had their own different
agendas in mind. However, the only intention of the Somali Federal
government to participate in this round of talks was to use this opportunity
in their reelection campaign. The Somali delegation was not prepared for
an honest and difficult discussion.They did not anticipate how far apart the
two sides were on the issues.
Obviously, it was not the intended outcome for Farmajo and his
regime.The Somalia delegation led by Farmajo anticipated cordial and
comforting discussions that would ultimately lead to handshakes and
photo-ops for their upcoming reelection campaign of 2021, hence the
delay of the talks for three and half years.
On the other hand Somaliland leaders especially Muse Bihi, the president
of Somaliland was well-prepared to seize the moment and take advantage
of this unique opportunity and present a very strong case at an
international arena.
Muse Bihi litigated the case from the inception of the
failed union to the tumultuous journey that followed and ultimately led to
the reclaim of their independence. He demonstrated a significant historic
sequence of events up to the current affairs between the two neighboring
countries and show-cased their agenda skillfully and with a style.
Muse Bihi showed undisputed and strong presidential leadership skills and
superior knowledge of the issues at hand. On the other hand, the Somalia
delegation showed lack of interest and lower confidence in their
government by not having a mandate or decision making capabilities,
especially for the last three days of the talks. When certain issues were
brought forth for discussion and immediate decision making, they said, we
have to consult our leaders, which means the president of Somalia,
Farmajo, who left the meeting after the opening.
Therefore, moving forward it would be very difficult to reach any
formidable resolution unless the participants have a full mandate from their
perspective governments.
Works Cited
“Somalia and Somaliland Sign “Ankara Communique”.” Anadolu Ajansı,
www.aa.com.tr/en/turkey/somalia-and-somaliland-sign-ankaracommunique/255372. Accessed 20 June 2020.
more recommended stories
-
Navigating Through Turbulence: The Role of Somalia’s Foreign Ministry in Shaping Future Relations with Somaliland.
By: Abdi Jama In the nuanced.
-
A Vision for Change: Dr. Abdirahman Irro’s Blueprint for Somaliland’s Future
Dr. Abdirahman Mohamed Abdillahi Irro, a.
-
Past, Present, and Future of Somaliland: A Nation at the Crossroads
The story of Somaliland is marked.
-
The High Cost of Non-Visionary Leadership: Analyzing Somaliland under President Colonel Muse Bihi
By: Abdi Jama In the intricate.